Three weeks and four days into a war with no declared end state, President Donald Trump told the world Friday he was "considering winding down" military operations in Iran - then the U.S. military announced it was deploying three more amphibious assault ships and 2,500 additional Marines to the region. Kuwait's Mina Al-Ahmadi refinery is burning. NATO is evacuating Iraq. The IRGC general who said Iran is still building missiles was killed in an airstrike mid-news cycle. Oil sits above $110 a barrel. This is where Day 25 stands.
Shortly after oil prices sent U.S. equity markets sharply lower on Friday, President Trump posted a message on his social media platform that read: "We are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East."
The post landed within hours of the Pentagon confirming it was deploying three additional amphibious assault ships and roughly 2,500 Marines to the region - the second such surge in days. Just days earlier, another group of amphibious assault ships carrying 2,500 Marines was redirected from the Pacific to the Middle East. Those forces are joining more than 50,000 U.S. troops already deployed to the region, according to AP News.
The administration has simultaneously requested $200 billion from Congress to fund the war - a figure that does not suggest winding down anything.
"We are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East." - President Donald Trump, social media post, March 20, 2026
The contradictions are stark enough that analysts in Washington spent Friday afternoon trying to decode what "objectives" even means in this context. The U.S. and Israel have offered shifting rationales for the conflict since strikes began on February 28: eliminating Iran's nuclear and missile programs, fostering an internal uprising that topples the government, decapitating the Revolutionary Guard's command structure. None of those objectives have been declared complete. None of them likely can be.
The market interpreted the post as noise, not signal. Stocks recovered partially before close, but oil remained elevated and analysts at several desks said the statement had zero credibility given simultaneous military build-up.
The Gulf is no longer a safe buffer zone. Two waves of Iranian drones struck Kuwait's Mina Al-Ahmadi oil refinery early Friday, sparking fires at one of the largest processing facilities in the Middle East. The refinery has capacity to process some 730,000 barrels of oil per day, according to AP News.
Iran has dramatically escalated attacks on Gulf Arab energy infrastructure since Israel bombed Iran's South Pars offshore natural gas field earlier in the week. The shift represents a calculated strategy: if Iran cannot stop U.S. and Israeli strikes on its own territory, it can damage the energy exports of Gulf states that have, at minimum, tolerated the war from their territory.
Bahrain also reported fires after shrapnel from an intercepted projectile landed on a warehouse. Saudi Arabia said it shot down multiple drones targeting its oil-rich Eastern Province. The attacks hit on the same day that Iranians were celebrating Nowruz - the Persian New Year - a fact that holds strategic symbolism: Iran is fighting not from a position of desperation but from one that signals it can sustain military operations even on its most sacred holiday.
The Strait of Hormuz remains the central chokepoint. A fifth of the world's crude oil and liquefied natural gas transits this waterway, and Iran's continued interference with shipping - combined with attacks on Gulf processing infrastructure - is creating a compound energy supply crisis. Europe's benchmark natural gas has risen roughly 71 percent since the war started, according to AP reporting. In the United States, gasoline has jumped 30 percent to an average of $3.88 per gallon, with California already above $5.62.
"Higher gasoline and diesel prices are now costing the U.S. economy half a billion dollars more every single day (and rising) versus three weeks ago. A staggering rise and near record-setting." - Patrick De Haan, petroleum analyst, GasBuddy, cited by AP News
The economic pressure now feeding into Trump's social media post about "winding down" is real. American consumers are approaching $4 per gallon at the pump, which historically has been the tipping point for behavioral change - reduced driving, cutbacks in discretionary spending, pressure on retail and food sectors that rely on trucking logistics. Diesel costs 36 percent more than before the war started, now sitting near $5.10 per gallon.
A significant and underreported development came Friday when NATO confirmed it had pulled several hundred personnel out of Iraq and relocated them to Europe. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO's top commander, confirmed the withdrawal. The personnel were part of NATO's security advisory mission established in 2018 to advise Iraqi defense and security officials.
The withdrawal came after a string of Iranian attacks on troops at British, French, and Italian bases in Iraq - a demonstration that Iran has successfully expanded the battlefield's western border. Iraq, nominally a sovereign ally that hosts U.S. and Western forces under a separate framework, is now functionally a war zone by extension.
The NATO exit from Iraq matters beyond the immediate security calculus. It is the clearest sign yet that the alliance has decided its exposure in the region must be reduced, not increased. This stands in direct contrast to the U.S. posture, which - despite Trump's "wind down" posting - is adding forces, not removing them.
Iran has also explicitly targeted what it cannot destroy: the credibility of America's partnerships. Turkish, German, and French officials have been progressively more vocal about their opposition to the war's escalatory trajectory. NATO's Iraq exit, while framed as a security precaution, feeds a narrative that the coalition is fracturing - a narrative Tehran has been cultivating since the first week of strikes.
One of the stranger moments of Day 25 came when Gen. Ali Mohammad Naeini, a spokesman for Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, was quoted by a state-run newspaper saying Iran continues to manufacture missiles despite Israel's claim that it had destroyed Iran's production capabilities. Iranian state television later said that Naeini was killed in an airstrike before the day was out.
The sequence - defiant public statement, immediate killing - encapsulates the asymmetric nature of information warfare in this conflict. Israel and the U.S. have destroyed Iran's conventional command hierarchy to an extraordinary degree. The elder Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed in the war's opening shots. Ali Larijani, secretary of the Supreme National Security Council and one of Iran's most powerful figures, was subsequently killed. A raft of other top military and political leaders have also been eliminated.
Iran's new Supreme Leader, 56-year-old Mojtaba Khamenei - who inherited power after his father's assassination - has not been seen in public since the airstrike that killed the elder Khamenei and reportedly wounded him. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu noted this directly: "Mojtaba, the replacement ayatollah, has not shown his face. Have you seen him? We haven't, and we can't vouch for what exactly is happening there."
"Iran's command and control structure is in utter chaos." - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, press conference, March 20, 2026
But analysts caution against interpreting leadership disruption as institutional collapse. Burcu Ozcelik of the Royal United Services Institute, a UK-based defense and security think tank, told AP that the change could be gradual rather than sudden. "The fixation on the terminology of 'regime collapse' is obscuring the fact that the regime is already changing," Ozcelik said - but stressed that the full impact on Iran's power structure "could take years, not weeks or months."
The Revolutionary Guard appears to be the real power now. Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group, was blunt: "The Revolutionary Guard is the state now." With the civilian leadership structure disrupted and Mojtaba Khamenei lacking the institutional authority his father commanded, the Guard - which runs parallel to Iran's regular armed forces and is constitutionally enshrined - has stepped into the vacuum.
New Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei issued a Nowruz statement praising Iranian steadfastness and dismissing the U.S.-Israeli strategy as built on "an illusion" - the idea that killing top leaders could trigger the government's overthrow. The statement, read on Iranian television, was notable for its defiant tone even as airstrikes landed in Tehran on the same day.
Iran's top military spokesman, Gen. Abolfazl Shekarchi, went further. In a Friday statement, Shekarchi warned that "parks, recreational areas and tourist destinations" worldwide would not be safe for Iran's enemies. The threat renewed concerns that Tehran may revert to using militant networks and proxy attacks beyond the Middle East - a tactic it employed for decades through Hezbollah, the Quds Force, and allied cells in Europe, South America, and Africa.
This is not idle rhetoric. Iran's "Axis of Resistance" proxy network - built over four decades through the expeditionary Quds Force - has deep operational infrastructure across multiple continents. Hezbollah, while weakened by Israeli strikes on Lebanon over the past year, retains cells with global reach. Iran-linked networks have historically targeted Israeli and Jewish community sites in countries including Argentina, Bulgaria, and Cyprus.
The tourist threat escalates the war's psychological dimensions. The Gulf tourism industry - Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Bahrain, Qatar - is already reeling from the conflict. European travel advisories for the entire region have been upgraded. An explicit threat to "recreational areas" globally signals Iran may be attempting to export pressure into countries currently staying neutral, hoping to generate domestic political opposition to continued Western support for the war.
Beneath the operational noise of Day 25 sits the war's most consequential unresolved problem: roughly 970 pounds of enriched uranium that Iran possesses - enough material for an estimated 10 nuclear weapons, according to IAEA estimates cited by AP News - remains unaccounted for and unsecured.
Trump launched the war with one of his stated objectives being ensuring Iran would "never have a nuclear weapon." He has been consistent on this point even as other rationales have shifted. But the practical question of how that objective gets achieved is one his administration has been conspicuously non-transparent about.
Much of the enriched uranium stockpile is believed to be buried under the rubble of a mountain facility struck in U.S. bombings that Trump previously claimed had "obliterated" Tehran's nuclear program. Nuclear experts say securing or destroying the material cannot be accomplished without a sizable deployment of U.S. troops into Iran - an operation the president has explicitly said he does not want to pursue.
The tension between objective and means is acknowledged even within Republican ranks. Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told reporters: "No one has given me a briefing on how you would do it without boots on the ground. It doesn't mean you can't. But no one's ever briefed me about it."
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat on the same committee, was sharper: "Some of the objectives that he continues to espouse simply cannot be achieved without a physical presence there - securing the uranium cannot be done without a physical presence." The senator said he remains "deeply fearful that the president has put the nation on a path" that will require exactly the kind of ground deployment Trump has publicly opposed.
Meanwhile, a perverse secondary risk is building. Analysts and lawmakers warn that if Iranian hardliners survive the war and emerge with more power - which is what appears to be happening as the Revolutionary Guard fills the leadership vacuum - they may be more motivated than ever to build nuclear weapons, viewing a bomb as the only reliable deterrent against future U.S. and Israeli military action. The very war launched to eliminate Iran's nuclear ambition may be creating the conditions that accelerate it.
Trump's "wind down" post may be one of three things: a deliberate de-escalatory signal meant to give Iran a face-saving off-ramp, a pressure release for domestic markets rattled by energy prices, or simply an impulsive post disconnected from the actual military planning happening in the Pentagon and CENTCOM. None of those interpretations inspires confidence.
The military reality argues against a quick end. U.S. forces in the region are being reinforced, not reduced. The Strait of Hormuz remains blocked or severely constricted. Iran's attacks on Gulf energy infrastructure are escalating in scope. There are no ceasefire talks underway, no visible diplomatic back-channel, no third-party mediator with credibility in both capitals.
Iran's capacity to absorb punishment while continuing to hit back has surprised many Western analysts. The Revolutionary Guard, which has assumed de facto command, was designed precisely for this scenario - a decentralized, hardened military structure that can operate without unified central command. It has spent decades building dispersed missile storage, underground command posts, and proxy relationships across the region and beyond. Decapitating the visible political leadership has not stopped it.
The economic clock is ticking loudly in Washington. Every day the war continues costs the U.S. economy roughly half a billion dollars more in elevated energy prices alone, before factoring in market volatility, supply chain disruption, and military expenditure. American consumers approaching $4 at the pump - and Europe approaching energy rationing - represent political forces that will intensify as spring turns to summer and driving season begins.
The nuclear question provides the most dangerous long tail. If the war ends without resolving the enriched uranium problem - and current trajectories suggest it might - the world emerges from this conflict with a more radicalized, Revolutionary Guard-dominated Iran, a decimated but not destroyed nuclear program, and the precedent that regime change from the air produces chaos, not stability.
Trump's post said "winding down." The next few days will show whether the words mean anything at all. So far, every signal from the military, the budget, and the battlefield points in exactly the opposite direction.
Get BLACKWIRE reports first.
Breaking news, investigations, and analysis - straight to your phone.
Join @blackwirenews on Telegram